To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.mediawatchOpen lugnet.mediawatch in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 MediaWatch / 2105
2104  |  2106
Subject: 
Re: BrickiWiki
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch
Date: 
Wed, 17 May 2006 13:59:49 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
249 times
  
In lugnet.general, Timothy Gould wrote:
   In lugnet.general, Bryan Kinkel wrote:
   This link arrived in my mailbox this morning courtesy of Google Alerts:

http://brickiwiki.wetpaint.com

Is this a legitamate AFOL effort or a company attaching itself to the LEGO brand?

-- Bryan

Also announced here. IMO this is not a legitimate effort but is an attachment. Brickwiki (no extra i) has been around for quite some time, is quite comprehensive and is most definitely an AFOL effort.

To be honest, I’m really unimpressed by this effort as it basically steals the name of what exists for no reason I can see other than to sell their brand.


I concur wholeheartedly. On principle I personally will never use it, and I would encourage all other AFOLs to avoid it as well, sticking to the homegrown original Brickwiki.

In fact, I think that there should be a frontpage link on LUGNET to a little tutorial showing how AFOLs can actually contribute to the project (needs to be so simple that even I can get it:-) Brickwiki has, in my estimation, been flying too low under the radar.

JOHN



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: BrickiWiki
 
Another fan effort that needs more publicity is (URL) Wiki-Brick-Links> by Klas Schöldström. This is simply a fan-updatable link database using the wiki format. Ultimately an interactive site is the only solution to the constant problem of outdated (...) (19 years ago, 17-May-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
  Re: BrickiWiki
 
(...) Unless someone else has taken to being you, you seem to have got at least the basics right ;) I noticed your edit the other day. A good place to start with BrickWiki is probably the (URL) FAQ>. Tim PS. It has come to my attention that the (...) (19 years ago, 17-May-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: BrickiWiki
 
(...) Also announced (URL) here>. IMO this is not a legitimate effort but is an attachment. (URL) Brickwiki> (no extra i) has been around for quite some time, is quite comprehensive and is most definitely an AFOL effort. To be honest, I'm really (...) (19 years ago, 17-May-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)

7 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR