| |
In lugnet.general, Bryan Kinkel wrote:
| |
This link arrived in my mailbox this morning courtesy of Google Alerts:
http://brickiwiki.wetpaint.com
Is this a legitamate AFOL effort or a company attaching itself to the LEGO
brand?
-- Bryan
|
Also announced here. IMO this is not a
legitimate effort but is an attachment. Brickwiki
(no extra i) has been around for quite some time, is quite comprehensive and is
most definitely an AFOL effort.
To be honest, I’m really unimpressed by this effort as it basically steals the
name of what exists for no reason I can see other than to sell their brand.
Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: BrickiWiki
|
| (...) I concur wholeheartedly. On principle I personally will never use it, and I would encourage all other AFOLs to avoid it as well, sticking to the homegrown original (URL) Brickwiki>. In fact, I think that there should be a frontpage link on (...) (18 years ago, 17-May-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | BrickiWiki
|
| This link arrived in my mailbox this morning courtesy of Google Alerts: (URL) this a legitamate AFOL effort or a company attaching itself to the LEGO brand? -- Bryan (18 years ago, 17-May-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
