 | | Re: Lore on Lego vs. Legos —Robb King
| | | | (...) Good point, but I think TLG said the same thing 24 years ago. (URL) <<-- notice bottom of ad. (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.mediawatch)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lore on Lego vs. Legos —Matthew Miller
| | | | | Robb King <rk@KILLTHISrobbking.com> wrote: [snip] (...) [snip] (...) Yes, that's the "Lego trademark page" referred to. (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.mediawatch)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Lore on Lego vs. Legos —Robb King
| | | | | (...) Yeah, but within that trademark blurb, the LEGO Group asks you to refer to their product as LEGO bricks or toys, in the plural. People can read that a couple of ways: from the "brand name protection" angle, or from the "settle this plural (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.mediawatch)
| | | | | | |
