Subject:
|
Re: Article On Playmobil
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.mediawatch
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:54:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1048 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.mediawatch, James Stacey wrote:
> Are they saying precicely what we'd like LEGO to be saying ??
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2ksug
For me, anyway: Just about. Licensing has brought us a lot of new parts and some
neat sets but it's not clear that was the only way to get those.
The question is, is LEGO different enough from Playmobil that the same strategy
wouldn't work for LEGO? I'm not sure but am tending to think not that different.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Article On Playmobil
|
| (...) Licensing or not, they are very different products. Playmobil is not a building toy. Lego has been wishing to bypass the fact that it is a building toy! Quick-build and action playset and all that. Playmobil has even tried to become a building (...) (21 years ago, 26-Dec-03, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Article On Playmobil
|
| Are they saying precicely what we'd like LEGO to be saying ?? (URL) Stacey ------ www.minifig.co.uk Lugnet Member #925 I'm a citizen of Legoland travellin' Incommunicado (21 years ago, 26-Dec-03, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
