| | Re: Customs question... Frank Filz
|
| | (...) This is the rule I have been using. (...) We have an advantage in the US, there is no duty on construction toys. Frank (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Customs question... Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) I generally do that as well, provided it's a purely business transaction--if I'm buying on proxy for someone else, as Frank well knows, I mark it "gift." But then again, as Frank notes, we don't pay duty on (toy parts, construction, plastic). (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Customs question... Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I would just write "LEGO construction toys". So far I have only had one apparent instance of customs interference with stuff I've received. The first order I had from Greenman's ABS (Netherlands) was clearly opened and resealed. It also wasn't (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Customs question... Pedro Silva
|
| | | | (...) Hmm... Most packages I received here have been opened by Customs. I think they are pretty relaxed about LEGO toys - meaning they will consider them "Gift" even if the value is not marked or clearly higher than the limit. I have asked, and I (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |