Subject:
|
Re: Value of 1682 Space Shuttle
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:05:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
995 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.theory, Frank Filz writes:
> I've been watching eBay somewhat to try and determine if it is worth
> selling a 1682. It looks like it isn't, they've been going for under $50
> (well, a NISB one did seem to go for $150 or so recently, but mine
> definitely is used). This eBay auction:
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=442033145
>
> Suggests to me that I might as well keep the set and break it down for
> parts. I don't think that was at all an outrageous price for those
> parts, and there's easily at least another $10 worth of parts in my
> book. Of course if I keep it, I may have more red lattice columns than
> black (well, probably not, I have almost 80 black ones).
I would say that Blacktron1 got a heck of a deal on that lot. I don't follow
eBay all that closely any more, too many lots (C.F. "nobody goes there any
more, it's too crowded"), but if I had seen that I would have snapped it up.
> I guess what I'm wondering is how many older sets are actually worth
> putting together versus just selling the parts. It's beginning to look
> like a set with unique parts is worth more than the full set<snip>.
You may be on to something there. But isn't that true of new sets too?
Properly broken up and sold, a Sith Infiltrator is worth more as parts than it
is whole.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Value of 1682 Space Shuttle
|
| I've been watching eBay somewhat to try and determine if it is worth selling a 1682. It looks like it isn't, they've been going for under $50 (well, a NISB one did seem to go for $150 or so recently, but mine definitely is used). This eBay auction: (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
