Subject:
|
Re: How does one become a "Guild of Bricksmiths(tm)" member?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:03:59 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
3068 times
|
| |
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message
news:FsHw2E.1uM@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.market.theory, Scott Arthur writes:
> >
> > "Kevin Wilson" <70641.507@compuserve.com> wrote in message
> > news:38E97AEF.1E8CFE2B@compuserve.com...
> > > Richard Marchetti wrote:
> > > > Factionalism within Lugnet begins: the Council, the Guild of • Builders,
> > > etc.
> > >
> > > If you mean the Guild of BrickSMITHS, it is no more "within LUGNET" • than
> > > it is "within RTL". Completely separate entity. Nor is it a faction.
> >
> >
> >
> > faction = a group within a larger group.
>
> Warning, some words elided from the above by Scott.
...are you insinuating I would seek to deliberately mislead anyone? A
faction is "group within a larger group", you may choose to be paranoid
regarding RM's usage of the word... I do not. :-)
Scott A
>
> http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=faction
>
> gives as the first reference:
>
> 1.A group of persons forming a cohesive, usually contentious minority • within a
> larger group.
> 2.Conflict within an organization or nation; internal • dissension:
> "Our own beloved country . . . is now
> afflicted with faction and civil war" (Abraham Lincoln).
>
> and further down
>
> faction n 1: a clique that seeks power usually through intrigue [syn: • cabal,
> junta, junto, camarilla] 2: a dissenting
> clique [syn: sect]
>
> My perception is that under these definitions we are not a "faction". • While we
> are within a larger group, we aren't engaged in "intruige" (although our • sets
> are more intruiging than TLC work at current), we seek no power other than • that
> which the market gives us, (to influence what is available now and in • future)
> and are certainly not conflicting or fomenting internal dissent.
>
> If Richard percieves people getting together to bring fans better sets as
> "seeking power" (dunno, he chose to use the word faction, but that may not • be
> what he meant), he may have other issues. But then, he may not have read • our
> stuff all that closely, since he didn't get our name right. I'd give him • the
> benefit of the doubt, after he has read it closely, I'd invite his • comments.
>
> I'd say that this is at least tangentially related to .theory
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
