 | | Re: Please don't solicit people that report sales —Will Hess
|
| | | (...) comfortable (...) I would hope none :-) (...) for (...) This supports my argument that such posts belong in the local groups. Your post was directed to the few members of the Lugnet community who were best able to take advantage of the find. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Please don't solicit people that report sales —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | (...) I don't know, I think that particular find should have been posted to .shopping - they could take phone orders and ship, so ANYONE (OK, maybe just "anyone in the US", if they wouldn't have shipped overseas) could have gotten the sets. I guess (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Please don't solicit people that report sales —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) Some other considerations for posting in .shopping: - Many folks post when they find out about K-Mart etc. sales. 95% of the time, those sales are applicable for the whole US, and thus have broad appeal. But many folks who post these notices (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Please don't solicit people that report sales —Naji Norder
|
| | | | (...) As another consideration, .shopping is the proper newsgroup for FOTW messages. If my local toy store has 20 copies of a great old set and I buy them all, this would be the appropriate place to post that information. If my local toy store has (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
