 | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC?
|
|
(...) Do you mean legally? Or from a reputation perspective? I don't think that you are legally required (in a mutually voluntary transaction) to accept or not accept any particular form.(1) I certainly can, and will, refuse to accept payment in (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC?
|
|
(...) So you object to PayPal not giving you a free service? Welcome to the real world where everything has a cost. There ain't no free lunches. I'm not sure if PayPal has wrangled an agreement with the credit card companies or if they are eating (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC?
|
|
(...) Ooo. I think some nation just got slammed. Or is that nations? Steve (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC?
|
|
(...) What does the term "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private" mean? It's printed on all of our currency. I remember reading once (5-10 years ago) that all US cash had to be accepted as a form of payment except pennies. I (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC?
|
|
(...) More like Lar wants to go home and play with his Lego :) James (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | SARCASM WARNING re: PayPal payments
|
|
<GRIN> OK, Frank, how much am I going to charge you for paying me for those big gears </GRIN> (which finally arrived, so I do need your address to send them to you) Do you need the old-style studded wheels with metal axle for them? I'll scare some (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC?
|
|
(...) How so? All I am saying is that I am not home to process mail. I've said before that Josette doesn't like to do it, and doesn't do it very accurately. So getting mail is a huge hassle because I am not there to see it. Nothing else. However I (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC?
|
|
(...) Um... I give. For that matter, what does "in God we Trust" mean? I don't. Does that mean I can't use the money if I don't? I think that whatever terms I arrange and which the other party accepts, are binding. If I am not specific about how I (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC?
|
|
(...) No, no, no! You're supposed to dispense information. Jeez. ;-) (...) It is the invokation of good-luck voodoo that keeps our economy stable. Duh. (...) I don't think that's logically the same since it doesn't instruct on a point of law. I (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
