|
Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I like the idea of there being no
logs at all. It makes more room for people to be dishonest, but it adds
a lot more suprise and mystery to the whole process.
John Matthews wrote:
>
> I am not sure I like the online log because it kind of ruins the surprise of
> what's going to be in the box when you get it.... but I will play along.
>
> I have not yet recieved the Technic Box, but I think Larry said he was going
> to be very busy, and I am too, so just as well.
>
> John Matthews
>
> Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message
> news:379D2C31.D23B16AD@voyager.net...
> > Wow!!!
> >
> > Did you guys see what Phil did?
> >
> > That may actually be a better idea than putting something in the box
> > itself.
> >
> > Suggest that the box recepients after Phil chain on Phil's append...
> > and that Mike and the others start similar ones for their boxes. That
> > means you, John Neal. :-)
> >
> > --
> > Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
> > - - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
> > fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
> > lugnet.
> >
> > NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
> > will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Box Logs
|
| I am not sure I like the online log because it kind of ruins the surprise of what's going to be in the box when you get it.... but I will play along. I have not yet recieved the Technic Box, but I think Larry said he was going to be very busy, and I (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|