 | | Re: The Weeks box round two - who wants in? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | (...) Tom Stangl California (...) So, this box is 9.4 pounds right now. This is heavy. I have no problem with these boxes getting this heavy, but others do. What do you all suppose I should do? If you point your browser to (URL) you can see what's (...) (24 years ago, 4-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Weeks box round two - who wants in? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) Some thoughts: - remove most of the catalogs and instructions, those are wieghty, and generally of limited interest - is that mania magazine a recent one? If so, I'd hold it for a box which is about to go overseas - split the box into two (...) (24 years ago, 4-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The Weeks box round two - who wants in? —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | Please do lighten it, 9 lbs costs an obscene amount to ship unless you trudge to UPS, and even then it isn't cheap. You'd have to find an awful lot of pieces in the box to make it cheaper than an Ebay lot. Up to 8 lbs, USPS is generally cheaper than (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The Weeks box round two - who wants in? —Paul Sinasohn
|
| | | | Chris, I had expressed interest in round 2 before I left for my UK vacation. I'm in the same neighborhood as Tom Stangl; should I just piggyback on his session? Paul Sinasohn (24 years ago, 11-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
