 | | Re: Shop Names (Was: Re: BAYLIT - Brickbay) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) Here's an alternate thought: sort the shop-list by date-time of their most recent order. This *might* be viewed as punishing low-volume sites, but those are probably not very active anyway--all it would take is a single order to push a shop (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Shop Names (Was: Re: BAYLIT - Brickbay) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) But not if it was sorted in descending order. Anyone who knows what's going on, will know how they're sorted, and maybe it gives an edge to the smaller guys sometimes. And if you wanted to do it that way, maybe a sales volume for the past 24 (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Shop Names (Was: Re: BAYLIT - Brickbay) —Dan Jezek
|
| | | | (...) you (...) set (...) The most effective way of sorting the shops would be to sort by country then by state. That way if someone really really wanted to be on the top, they would have to relocate from Wyoming to Alabama. But seriously, sorting (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
