| |
"Linc Smith" <ldsmith@pfc.forestry.ca> writes:
> Fredrik Glöckner wrote in message ...
> so this
> > URL should be clickable: <URL:http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/htbin/rfc/
> > rfc1738.html>. Dunno if it works, though.
>
> It doesn't. Comments form others would be good. Although I always like a
> sample size of one (if the sample includes me) it is not very scientific.
It works for me (Gnus), but it fails to work when it has been quoted, so
it's probably not a good idea, anyway.
> A) <URL:http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/htbin/rfc/rfc1738.html>
>
> B) http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/htbin/rfc/rfc1738.html
>
> C) <http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/htbin/rfc/rfc1738.html>
I'd say a browser not capable of understanding A is not RFC 1738
compliant, and should be fixed. However, I normally write URLs on a
separate line, so I might as well use B, which seems to be the most
widely useable.
As a bottom line, I'd like to say: Whichever you choose, at least
include the "http://" part! :-)
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
