 | | Re: Can ebay feedback get worse than this: —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) I'm not sure what NaRUed is, although I imagine it's like ToSsed here. Slight change in topic... and why I set FUT .theory... There was an article in Forbes recently (not in the online version, I just searched...) about "feedback blackmail". (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Can ebay feedback get worse than this: —Paul Sinasohn
|
| | | | | (...) I'm not sure I agree with this. If I were to look at the details behind someone wiht that level of feedback (and I probably wouldn't), to see only 1 out of 4000 would tell me that one person didn't like the seller. Big deal. I could come up (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Can ebay feedback get worse than this: —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) I certainly take the time to look at the feedbacks. I try and look at all the negatives, but if they have 1000+, it's hard, but then of course 1 or 2 negatives per 1000 is meaningless. The question is how many folks look past the summary. I've (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Can ebay feedback get worse than this: —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | (...) NaRU = Not a Registered User Maggie C. (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
