| |
Dan Boger wrote:
> In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Ran Talbott writes:
> > If you buy from spammers, you support spam. If you say, "Well,
> > *this* spam is okay, because it's pitching something I like", you
> > lose your moral grounds for objecting to the next one that comes along
> > that you *don't* like.
>
> While true, that if you buy from spammers you make it ok, it's differnet to say
> that I may like the product, but I will not buy it from a spammer. Jenn and I
> are very much against spam, and IMO, the fact that it's lego related doesn't
> make it any better.
>
> Dan
A few weeks ago I did receive an email from these people questioning how I
personally felt about a LEGO Price List. I told them that I didn't object to it,
as long as it had a price range, and not a set figure. For insurance purposes we
really do need a price list. I believe many of you have had problems in getting
your collections insured when there is no single source document to reference. As
for EBAY sellers using the price list as a measuring stick??? Well if they price
things too high, they risk not having anyone bid on the merchandise. I have seen
this a lot lately anyway. And with LEGO Direct coming online, I think that the
secondary LEGO market may soften somewhat (although rare or in demand sets will not
be affected).
Gary Istok
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
