 | | Re: 4 town sets- 6331, 6615, 6567, 6572 - 3 day only —Mike Poindexter
| | | | Although I also hack my auctions here, I think this might be a little out of hand. Perhaps I am just not realizing that I could/should be doing this as well. I do not mean this as a slam of Andreas or anyone else, but shouldn't these listings be put (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 4 town sets- 6331, 6615, 6567, 6572 - 3 day only —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | | (...) Certainly been my understanding of desired practice, put all your flogs in one post, then if you feel the need to re-flog, do it as a follow up. Only if you have substantially new listings should you start a new thread, and then only one. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 4 town sets- 6331, 6615, 6567, 6572 - 3 day only —Mike Poindexter
| | | | | | | Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:FsI7In.6Fs@lugnet.com... (...) of (...) as (...) these (...) of (...) one (...) I will then continue my practice of using few posts and try to set an accepted example, rather than a "must (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 4 town sets- 6331, 6615, 6567, 6572 - 3 day only —Andreas Stabno
| | | | | (...) Agreed, my friends. In my zeal to get rid of these sets, I probably posted too many separate messages. My intent was to put all related sets in a given lot (and message), but I can see that even with this limited "compartmentalization", there (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | | |
