 | | Re: Methodology: Reserve, Controlled Reserve, or No Reserve? —Mike Stanley
| | | | (...) Yeah, I gotta agree. I understand how the same item can reach 2x the reserve if the bidding starts low and then go unsold if the minimum is the high amount the seller wants, which kinda sucks, but I still don't like reserves, either as a buyer (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Methodology: Reserve, Controlled Reserve, or No Reserve? —Todd Lehman
| | | | | | (...) And the potential to make bidders *EXTREMELY* violently angry. Imagine if you lost out on something because your high bid of $110 was $15 less than the secret reserve price, and you held off on bidding on the same item in another auction (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Methodology: Reserve, Controlled Reserve, or No Reserve? —Charles Eric McCarthy
| | | | | (...) That used to be the case, but they've changed it. Now the listing fee is tied to the min bid or the reserve amount, whichever is greater. I still hate reserves, though, and I don't bid on items with reserves. My choice is (4) no reserves (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
| | | | | | |
