Subject:
|
RE: Does age affect value?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.appraisal
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Mar 2000 03:40:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3164 times
|
| |
|
|
From memory, the parts are generally bricks, with some of the 2x2 and 4x4
wheels with assosiated axle bricks. There are also quite a few of the 1x1
round bricks, which don't have the indentation round the base like the
modern ones. There were also several plates, including 2 4x8 (?) with 1
corner curved. The base of this is a grid, instead of the tubes used now.
There may be more parts, but I can't remember off-hand.
Benjamin Whytcross
BWhytcro@PacificAccess.com.au
> Whytcross, Benjamin wrote in message
> <1D0812CAE3E7D2118BCD00805FA76DEB019D483D@GW-EXG-NE01>...
> > I don't know if this is the right location for posting this, • but I was
> > wondering if the age of a part affects it's value.
> >
> > I'm asking this as I have quite a few parts from the early • 60's [I think],
> > which have a different moulding on the top of the studs [The • word LEGO is
> > smaller, and less angled], and was wondering if this would • affect their
> > value/collectability.
>
>
> It would depend on the parts. From my perspective, for the
> most part, the
> only standard bricks for which older would get me to pay
> anything more for
> would be old pre-tube bricks (I have a slight interest in
> putting together a
> "history of the brick" display). 1960s parts which are no
> longer made are a
> different story. Parts which have changed form slightly might
> gain a little
> higher interest from me, but not much.
>
> Frank
>
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
