 | | Re: Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
|
Hey Y'all: I am not the cross-posting genius or anything, so forgive me if this annoys. I just thought that the first time I posted this I might have pigeonholed it a little too much. The original of this post is available here: (URL) I could use (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
|
(...) Well, the idea comes from things like the "Comic Book Buyers Guide", "Wizard Magazine", or something like that. So yeah, the idea seems to be to protect the buyers in some way. And while comic books can be worth hundreds of thousands of (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
|
(...) I personally like the idea of a numeric grading system that also uses the labels you listed such as Very Good, Good, Poor, etc. Overall, your proposal appears easy to use and understand, primarily for buyers. The merchandising of new, unused (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Yup, 'tis fair. Also seems to be accurate, and sufficient, but I have to confess that my eyes started to glaze over about halfway down, and I personally will never use a grading system of that exactitude (either when selling, or (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
|
(...) Any constructive criticism in developing these grading standards is very much appreciated -- so thanks, Chris, for responding at all! The more voices I hear the better I can improve the standards and hopefully arrive at something that many (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
|
<snipped it all> Very good informative read, Rick. Reminds me of sports card grading systems. I think it'd be cool to get into the habit of using something like this; maybe a bit looser standards, but pretty close to. -Chris (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
|
Hey Y'all: I could use some feedback on the following. Please do not reply to me personally at my email address, but rather reply here so that others may take part in the discussion over the issues that may arise. Thanks in advance, Hop-Frog (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | value of '70s sets?
|
|
I have a friend who recentlly dug up his lego collection. ranging from the early '70 to the ealy '90 (but not particurarlly large, [two buckets]) in played with condition. I think I have found a few of the sets that some of the pieces have come (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | 12v transformer and Oval of track
|
|
What would be a good price for a 12v transformer without box and an oval of 12v track. I was thinking of £5 for the transformer and £10 for the track. Is that about right ???? Michael Pratt (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Re: market for RIS 1.0/1.5?
|
|
After seeing the recent posts about the RIS 1.5 being offered at CompUSA, I would like to offer this set for sale sooner rather than later. However, I'm not sure what price I should offer it for. I would appreciate any input from those more (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
