 | | Re: How complete R U? —Huw Millington
|
| | | (...) and (...) What about 1692, the boxed version of 1462, which is not on Pause, (but is on my space set database :-) ) I considered myself post-classic space complete, having *all* the sets in my database, until Grahame Reid told me about this (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: How complete R U? —Mark de Kock
|
| | | | | (...) Well, as I do not keep the package, 1462 = 1692 to me! (...) Of all the sets that were regulairly available in the Netherlands, I own all the sub-theme's, except the Mega/Magma Core Magnetizer (M:TRON) I am currently on two quests: 1) all (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: How complete R U? —Huw Millington
|
| | | | | | (...) That is not the case at all. The instructions do not have a dual-number on them therefore it must be considered a separate set. :-) Huw (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: How complete R U? —Mark de Kock
|
| | | | | | (...) (I could really defend myself by saying that I don't keep the instructions...) Okay, you win. IF I ever go through my hundreds of Instructions, I might find out what number is printed on this one. There are instructions, whith dual numbers (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: How complete R U? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) 1692 isn't, but 1694 is. Is there a third Galactic Scout set or is that a typo? --Todd (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: How complete R U? —Huw Millington
|
| | | | (...) a typo? Sorry, my mistake :-) Huw (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | |
