 | | Re: Sopwith Camel: Model Team by any other name...
|
|
"Nathaniel Cross" <nathaniel@than.org> wrote in message news:GDJ0t7.H1x@lugnet.com... (...) The (...) the (...) Well we would have to define modern I guess. Let's face it, the Sopwith is from another millennium now! Nearly a century old. Remember (...) (24 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Sopwith Camel: Model Team by any other name...
|
|
"Lawrence Wilkes" <lawrence@thewilkesf...rve.co.uk> wrote in message news:GDJ1MH.IGx@lugnet.com... (...) wings (...) for (...) Don't the Adventurer sets count as WW1 too? Certainly included a couple of biplanes (complete with guns) - one similar to (...) (24 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Sopwith Camel: Model Team by any other name...
|
|
I think the idea of no military sets extended to plausible reality. The space and medieval / fantasy are far enough removed from reality the adventure sets have dinosaurs / mummies and although they are around the right period they are not actuallty (...) (24 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
