 | | Re: Seperated at birth
|
| "Ian Bishop" <ian@goodlife.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:k1PgTRAAbM94EwX...n.co.uk... (...) Never having seen the Simpsons I am unsure if that's a compliment or an insult... Someone please advise :-) Huw (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: Seperated at birth
|
| (...) It's neither, merely an observation, don't worry! Smithers is quite an affable chap who acts as a tempering influence on his boss's more extreme ways of doing things. Ian Bishop, Ayrshire, UK (25 years ago, 15-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: Seperated at birth
|
| (...) (URL) is a mug shot of Smithers. Alan (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: Seperated at birth
|
| "Alan Gerber" <foofoogood@hotmail....ed_e-mail> wrote in message news:Ft8Btw.IIC@lugnet.com... (...) shot (...) Naah. I can't see the resemblence at all... Huw (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: Seperated at birth
|
| (...) What if the picture had the caption "LUGNETs most wanted" at the bottom? ;-) Richard (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: Seperated at birth
|
| Richard Franks <spontificus@__nospa...yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Ft9JzA.MKJ@lugnet.com... (...) in (...) ;-) No. a Scot (t) now takes that biscuit, doesn't he? :-O Huw (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: Seperated at birth
|
| (...) Nah.. "LUGNETs most wanted", if it existed, would most probably involve train windows somewhere along the way.. Richard (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| |
