Subject:
|
Re: Not looking good for our 2000 catalogue
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 22:01:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
370 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.loc.uk, David Graham writes:
> Huw,
>
> Any news on the Trains section?
> I has hoping that 4565 the freight train with cranes might be replaced with a
> new freight train.
>
> David
4565 continues in the US 2000 assortment of sets. Considering how bad LEGO
trains have become lately, consider this a good thing (though I don't know if
the set continues in Europe).
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread: ![Not looking good for our 2000 catalogue -Huw Millington (5-Jan-00 to lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Not looking good for our 2000 catalogue -Scott Arthur (6-Jan-00 to lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Not looking good for our 2000 catalogue -Huw Millington (6-Jan-00 to lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Not looking good for our 2000 catalogue -Michael Edwards (6-Jan-00 to lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Not looking good for our 2000 catalogue -David Graham (8-Jan-00 to lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|