Subject:
|
Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:49:33 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.ANTISPAMcom
|
Viewed:
|
1477 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard wrote:
>
> In lugnet.loc.uk, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> > > Richard thinks its wrong for some people to have more than others,
> > > presumably whether we're talking about money, Lego sets, or
> > > whatever. He's been fairly outspoken about it before.
> > >
> > > If you didn't catch it, he was making a reference to the problem he
> > > had with several Americans buying up tons of the Blue Hoppers a
> > > while back.
>
> I've replied to this elsewhere.
>
> > Ya, this really gets up my nose, as they say in the UK. Let's review,
> > one more time, the blue hopper thing, because, after all, it's me that
> > Richard is talking about.
>
> Am I? I ruddy well am not! I had no part in the whole blue hopper thread.
> And I was not referring to you, but anyone ordering unfeasably large numbers
> of (usually) very expensive sets.
Who says you're the Richard that I was talking about when I said "it's
me that Richard is talking about". :-) I was talking about the Richard
that Mike was talking about. :-) I knew which Richard he meant even if,
at the time, he misattributed it to the wrong Richard, which I didn't
catch. Does that help? :-)
> Up to this point, I'd respected Larry as a valuable member of the RTL and
> lugnet community (making more of a contribution in the past couple of years
> than I ever will). But right now, at least until I cool off, he's not on my
> list of top ten people.
Sorry to hear that. But if one misattribution washes away "two years of
contributions", so be it, I guess. I've never been much good at winning
popularity contests, nor cared to be, if the truth be told.
> And to top it off, after attacking me on the basis of a thread I've never
> posted to, Larry gives another contributor a ticking-off for incorrect
> attributions of messages. That REALY takes the biscuit. Especially as I'd
> been at pains to point out exactly which Richard I wasn't!!! (Which shouldn't
> be taken as a slight on the rest of Clan Richard)
>
> Richard Dewsbery
Wait, what does "ticking off" mean? My idiomatic UK english isn't
perfect, I'm just an anglophile, not a resident, but I thought it meant
to give someone rather a hard time or speak to them in an angry fashion.
Here's what I said:
> Richard, you have to be careful in trimming your attributions. What was
> ">>" in your post was not said by Scott, but rather the words of Nick G.
> Trimming off Nick's name can cause confusion.
I certainly did not MEAN those words to come out harshly and if they
read that way, I apologise... Was that a ticking off??
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc)
|
| (...) Ah, but to which Rich was your comment pitched? I'm pretty sure that the only contribution I made to the Blue Hopper thread was to try and get it off loc.uk once it became a discussion of how to get cheap DVDs! I may be wrong, but I searched (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
163 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
