| |
Troy Cefaratti <mnementh@sbase1.com> wrote:
> > It's wrong. You're cheating the organization when you use different
> > shipping addresses to make it look like you're not in the same
> > household.
>
> While I agree that cheating the company when you are actually a family is
> wrong, I also think that the method of limiting something to one per address
> is also wrong as well.
>
> If you are married, even if you have seperate paychecks and seperate tastes,
> you are still a "family". It is assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that you
> share the responsibilities of the household. If the company chooses to
> limit you to 1 of something per "household" then that is their choice.
> (agreement with their choice is a different matter).
>
> My problem with limiting by address is situations in which a group of people
> who are NOT a family live at the same address. At one time there were 4
> people living here at my house, only one of which was actually related to
> me. (I live with my brother)
>
> What happens if I want to order something with such a coupon, and say my
> friend who is living in the attic also wants to use the coupon to order
> something? We are in no way related. They just happen to be living at the
> same address because we had the room.
Nah, I don't see it being any different. It's a stupid rule either
way. The fact that my wife and I are married makes us no less
separate consumers than Bob and his roommate Phil. A stupid rule,
but one I choose to accept, mostly.
--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free!
http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
178 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
