 | | RE: New Zealanders Allowed?
|
|
(...) Yep...This is the Australia and Australian region organisation's forum. [Which was basically designed to allow us to conduct local sales/trades without being swamped by the US only trades etc. in .market] Welcome to the group... Benjamin (...) (26 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.nz)
|
| |
| | Re: Organising LegOz/org.au (was RE: Formal Lugnet memberships fr om A us...)
|
|
(...) <snip> How about removing .general from teh groups list on this discussion? It really is very Oz-specific now Kevin (26 years ago, 28-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.nz)
|
| |
| | RE: Organising LegOz/org.au (was RE: Formal Lugnet memberships fr om A us...)
|
|
Well, from the short list I've put together [appologies to anyone missed or incorrectly listed] the Aussies are: Vic Benjamin Whytcross James Ng Karen Barlow Michael Whytcross [doesn't post] Paul Baulch Steve Merlo Sue Ann Barber Warren Mccoy [At (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.nz)
|
| |
| | Re: Organising LegOz/org.au (was RE: Formal Lugnet memberships from A us...)
|
|
(...) <snipped for space> (...) Kerry makes lots of good points that I hadn't really though about and I think she's right. I had realised that Tas would never make a LUG on it's own but hadn't considered much further than hooking up with Vic. (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.nz)
|
| |
| | Re: Organising LegOz/org.au (was RE: Formal Lugnet memberships from A us...)
|
|
(...) What about three groups ? 1.NSW and QLD and New Zealand(if they want). 2.VIC and TAS. 3.WA Jane from SA can decide between 2 and 3. The separate group fro WA is because they are quite isolated, nothing personal pete.w (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.nz)
|
| |
| | Re: Organising LegOz/org.au (was RE: Formal Lugnet memberships from A us...)
|
|
(...) regions: (...) I think this might be a slightly heavy-weight organisation for the numbers of people involved! For example, I don't there are enough Qlders and NTers for a separate Northern group. Also, unless people live within 1-2 hours (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.nz)
|
| |
| | RE: Organising LegOz/org.au (was RE: Formal Lugnet memberships fr om A us...)
|
|
(...) Well, at present the names don't really matter, especially as the NSW/ACT group will probably remain as 'Studs'. The descriptions were just to show where the region is situated, and the final groups could choose their own names....Although, (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.nz)
|
| |
| | Re: Organising LegOz/org.au (was RE: Formal Lugnet memberships from A us...)
|
|
(...) I like this structure, makes very good sense to me. Although I'd think NSW and ACT might be better called the Eastern zoning and NZ etc something else (not sure what, Oceania? Offshore? Other? :)). Feel free to disagree. Deidre drb@tasmail.com (26 years ago, 28-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.nz)
|
| |
| | Organising LegOz/org.au (was RE: Formal Lugnet memberships from A us...)
|
|
(...) Yet another good reason for having organisers in each state for LegOz. They can help by handling this sort of thing, and sending the money to whoever will be posting it overseas. [1] Also a thought on LegOz organisation...instead of states, (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.nz)
|
| |
| | Re: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
(...) Maybe we should ask if they want to be included... Well guys? James (who notes that 'guys' is used in a non gender specific way) (26 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.nz)
|
