Subject:
|
Re: Names within lugnet.loc.dk hierarchy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.dk
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Sep 1999 13:24:46 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MIBM@IMAGE.spamcakeDKREMOVEUPPERCASE
|
Viewed:
|
3099 times
|
| |
|
|
"Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote:
> I was surprised to see that dk was split into regions.
> Denmark is so small, that I personally would subscribe to
> any event. If a really interesting event came up, I would
> then consider if it were too far away.
So was I for the same reason.
> However, there might of course be some in south Sweden who
> would be interested in events in København (Copenhagen).
> So I guess a geograhical division is useful.
Denmark east and Denmark west would make more sense. There is a bridge
now so that is it really doesnt matter. This argument also works when
considering that the royals already cut ribbon on the Øresundsbridge.
Not that that bridge is open for public yet or anything...
> But the traffic suggests that a single region is enough.
> You can always subdivide dk later, if the need arises.
> /Lars (in Århus)
Hmm Well with two us near København and you in Jylland and Jacob stuck
in Paris this appears to be very small .... too small. But I dont
think lugnet s marketing itself in denmark in any way.
-breiler
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Names within lugnet.loc.dk hierarchy
|
| Mikkel: (...) Jylland _is_ rather large, but I think I get the point. We just have to decide if the border is Storebaelt or Lillebaelt. Maybe Jylland, Fyn, and Sjaelland (with the obvious inclusion of the smaller islands). (...) Well, it's "only" 16 (...) (25 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.loc.dk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
