 | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| John Battcock wrote in message ... (...) number (...) us. I do not have information about S@H Canada closing, but it sounds like it could have some good and bad results. Anyway, I just wanted to say that on the mini-catalog for this year seen (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
| | | | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| Also, I dialed all of the different phone numbers listed and they all go right to Shop @ Home.... So, evidence tells me that LDM is just S@H renamed for the in-box mini catalogs. The phone numbers, physical addresses, and prices are identical. Kevin (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
| | | | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| Kevin Salm <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote in message news:FMtHCn.ELp@lugnet.com... (...) [big cut] (...) If the debate is about whether or not S@H Canada is closing, it's not a debate. It was first mentioned on RTL many months ago and when I placed (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
| | | | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| I did not mean to imply that S@H Canada will not be closing. I have read the discussion and understand that. It just seemed to me that there might be some confusion about the wording on the in-box mini catalogs. I was just trying to eliminate (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
| | | | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| Kevin Salm <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote in message news:FMtI8z.Gpp@lugnet.com... (...) on (...) Oops sorry! For me the possible name change is trivial. I just assumed you meant the S@H Canada closing. "Don't assume, cause you'll make an..." ;-) TJ (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
| | | | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| (...) Just did. --Todd (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
| | | | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| (...) Yes, she has had computer trouble. James Powell (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
| |
