|
|
 | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| (...) Ya, you should not get hit with the PST if it is being shipped out of province. (except if in Atlantic Canada...) If it is being shipped from Ontario to BC, then the only tax payable is the GST . You are responsible for paying the BC sales tax (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.loc.ca.bc)
| | | | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| Tony Jang wrote in message ... (...) from (...) My theory if anyone wants to hear it is that Chpaters would be required to collect PST on any items because the store maintains a physical presence ( I assume there must be a store somewhere) In BC. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.loc.ca.bc)
| | | | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| Kevin Salm <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote in message news:FMtI8z.Gpp@lugnet.com... (...) on (...) Oops sorry! For me the possible name change is trivial. I just assumed you meant the S@H Canada closing. "Don't assume, cause you'll make an..." ;-) TJ (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
| | | | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| I did not mean to imply that S@H Canada will not be closing. I have read the discussion and understand that. It just seemed to me that there might be some confusion about the wording on the in-box mini catalogs. I was just trying to eliminate (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
| | | | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| Kevin Salm <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote in message news:FMtHCn.ELp@lugnet.com... (...) [big cut] (...) If the debate is about whether or not S@H Canada is closing, it's not a debate. It was first mentioned on RTL many months ago and when I placed (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
|
|
