Subject:
|
RE: We should draft an "official" letter to Lego Australia (any o bjections to this?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Sun, 28 May 2000 23:06:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1453 times
|
| |
|
|
No complaints from here, as long as we get a chance to comment before it's
sent off. [Bit hard for me to get to Sydney for LegOz...And I'm sure
Jonathan and Rachel would have even more trouble :)
Benjamin Whytcross
BWhytcro@PacificAccess.com.au
Ph: (03) 9856 5282
Directory Technology Pty Ltd
1/436 Elgar Road,
Box Hill, 3128
Growing older is compulsory..Growing up isn't :-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santosh [mailto:santosh@student.unsw.edu.au]
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 8:58 AM
> To: lugnet.loc.au@lugnet.com
> Subject: Re: We should draft an "official" letter to Lego
> Australia (any
> objections to this?)
>
>
> Well how about I do this.
>
> I'll take the letter in it's latest revision off here and
> show it to everyone
> this Sunday at LegOz.3 As a "final" draft, then post back here the
> comments/changes etc.. before sending it off.
>
> What I really want to know is - Is there anyone that objects to this
> occurring, any matter at all, Because It's not fair to send
> it off on behalf
> of people if they don't agree with anything being done.
>
> Santosh
>
>
> PS. My heater broke down Friday night, and so a freak cold front hits
> us..chance or coincidence?
>
> In lugnet.loc.au, David Drew writes:
> >
> > "Whytcross, Benjamin" <BWhytcro@pacificaccess.com.au> wrote • in message
> > news:1D0812CAE3E7D2118BCD00805FA76DEB022A4D8F@gw-exg-ne01.pac • ificaccess.com.
> au...
>
>
> > (or we could always be paid in bricks!).
>
> I think that the letter's pretty good, but I think that we should remove
> this line. Seems too desperate.
>
> my 2c,
> David Drew.
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
