Subject:
|
Re: ROBOLAB
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:16:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
223 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Jason King writes:
> You would probably be better of using NQC (Not Quite C) it is a far more
> powerful language. Which is not to difficult to use . And its FREE.
> Go to http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/markov/lego/rcxcc/ to find a easier to use
> NQC interface.
You might also consider trying the revised version of RcxCC that I am
maintaining. It has lots of additional features and support for RCX2 and
Scout included. It can be obtained via:
http://members.aol.com/johnbinder/rcxcc.htm
John Hansen
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: ROBOLAB
|
| Many thanks Jason and John, I'll be playing around with RcxCC this weekend. Thanks again. Anthony (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: ROBOLAB
|
| You would probably be better of using NQC (Not Quite C) it is a far more powerful language. Which is not to difficult to use . And its FREE. Go to (URL) to find a easier to use NQC interface. Hope this helps - Jason King LugNet #665 Anthony (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
