Subject:
|
Re: ROBOLAB
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:10:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
280 times
|
| |
|
|
You would probably be better of using NQC (Not Quite C) it is a far more
powerful language. Which is not to difficult to use . And its FREE.
Go to http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/markov/lego/rcxcc/ to find a easier to use
NQC interface.
Hope this helps
-
Jason King
LugNet #665
Anthony <a_zavaglia@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:GF5EC9.F6C@lugnet.com...
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has used ROBOLAB? Is it worth getting? What
> advantages does it offer over the mindstorms version? Any
> advantages/disadvantages? I figured at almost $60 it's not expensive, but
> then it is cheap - does that mean it's bad?
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> Anthony
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: ROBOLAB
|
| (...) You might also consider trying the revised version of RcxCC that I am maintaining. It has lots of additional features and support for RCX2 and Scout included. It can be obtained via: (URL) Hansen (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | ROBOLAB
|
| Hi, I was wondering if anyone has used ROBOLAB? Is it worth getting? What advantages does it offer over the mindstorms version? Any advantages/disadvantages? I figured at almost $60 it's not expensive, but then it is cheap - does that mean it's bad? (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
