Subject:
|
Re: Lego not an original idea?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 15:01:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
592 times
|
| |
|
|
Santosh Bhat wrote in message ...
> Apparently Lego has taken Australian (and other) companies to court over • their
> product. Whilst they themsleves may be illegitimate themselves.
I do have one question relating to this. Our son is getting a Rokenbok set
for Christmas which is a RC type building set. The ELEVATED road plates are
Lego compatible (Mom has her eyes on these). The catalog states that in the
US and Canada the road plates are Lego compatible but in all other markets
they have a grid pattern. Why would this be? Are North American laws more
generous ?
Rose
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lego not an original idea?
|
| (...) I'm not sure. What I do know (or have an opinion on) is that the LEGO compatibility of these plates is of marginal value. They only have studs on top, and it looks like really all you could do is build on top of them, which seems pretty (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Lego not an original idea?
|
| Apparently Lego has taken Australian (and other) companies to court over their product. Whilst they themsleves may be illegitimate themselves. (URL) personally don't care too much for this article. Especially as it was on the website of a competitor (...) (24 years ago, 17-Dec-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.general)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
