| |
In lugnet.org.au, David Drew writes:
> > In lugnet.org.au, Benjamin Whytcross writes:
>
> > [1] subject to renaming IF we ever organise this numbering system...ranked
> > up there with selecting state "organisers" to give the group structure, • and
> > sending a letter to LA announcing our group(s). Maybe we should look • towards
> > doing these soon ???
>
> How about we just use the state system that someone mentioned? ie
>
> 2001.VIC.1
> 2001.NSW.1
>
> We can also use local names;
> 2001.STUDS.1
>
> A lot more simple than what we have now.
I would add LegOz to the start, so that they relate to each other.
LegOz2001.VIC.1 or LegOz.2001.NSW.1
Let's keep the state abbreviations, because that's what these groupings are.
-pw
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LegOz 2001.1 :)
|
| ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benjamin Whytcross" <b_whytcross@hotmail.com> To: <lugnet.org.au@lugnet.com>; <lugnet.loc.au@lugnet.com>; <lugnet.loc.au.vic.m...ugnet.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 10:14 PM Subject: LegOz 2001.1 :) (...) (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
