Subject:
|
RE: Official LegOz webpage
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Jun 2000 03:49:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
647 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
well.....if you'd like,i can give you the account info, and you can post any
new pages [eg LegOz 2000.5] there. As to the different styles...Studs is
different to 'Mugs' [hopefully we'll be able to change this on the 16th
[LegOz 2000.4]], and when all the different groups are combined we get
LegOz. I'm actually hoping I can get at least 1 other persons assistance
with this [actually 1 person from each region/group] so that they can update
their group/regions pages and event pages with appropriate
information.[1][2]
I'm also hoping we can get some 'organisers' for each group/region [as I've
been pushing for a little while] so that we can list their e-mail addresses
with each group as someone to contact for more information. [I'll also list
the legoz email address so they can contact that if they wish, or if there's
no local rep for their area.]
[1] covering past and future events, members information [currently to be
based on roll-call info, maybe soon to include wants lists?], store info
[best and worst in region, sales] and any other info relevent to the group.
[2] If you want the job for Studs, Richard, it's yours :)
Benjamin Whytcross
BWhytcro@PacificAccess.com.au
Ph: (03) 9856 5282
Directory Technology Pty Ltd
1/436 Elgar Road,
Box Hill, 3128
Growing older is compulsory..Growing up isn't :-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Parsons [mailto:rparsons@hinet.net.au]
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 12:42 PM
> To: lugnet.loc.au@lugnet.com; lugnet.org.au@lugnet.com
> Subject: Re: Official LegOz webpage
>
>
> In lugnet.loc.au, Benjamin Whytcross writes:
>
> > Well, I knew about this[Studs website], but I thought that
> > having all the groups info on the one site would be a
> > better idea, allowing anyone interested in the group to
> > access all required info easily. I can just as easily
> > link to the current page if that's preferable.
>
> Being the unconscionably lazy zot that I am, I would
> definitely go the link
> model if it were me. The only reasons I can think of for not
> doing so are:
>
> different style on the Studs site
> concern about linking back to your site
>
> I would be more than happy to add some text/link to your site
> so that people
> don't get unneccesarily marooned there.
>
> No doubt the styles will be different.
>
> Your site, your call ;-)
>
> Regards
> Richard
> Still studly going...
>
|
|
1 Message in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|