| |
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.trains, Gary Quinlan wrote:
| |
Fellow Lego Train Enthusiasts
Check out the link to see ideas for a new geometry of Lego Tracks,
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=28054
Maybe with enough chatter on Lugnet and other sites Lego might decide to
investigate the possibilities! Can’t hurt to try.
|
No, it can’t, but this topic isn’t new. Check out the ILTCO library for a
presentation by Ben Fleskes about
track
geometry. He served up everything TLG would need to proceed with this idea
years ago.
|
That’s my point, maybe one posting every few years doesn’t really constitute a
real need to TLG, they might need a more blatant approach.
| |
I believe that TLG will never make the intellectual leap from
LEGO trains as a toy to LEGO trains as a hobby. It’s too radical. (which
sounds kind of silly, given some of the stinker ideas with which TLG has
decided to run (ahem, Galidor, Znap, to name a few)
|
If they would of put that money into new track geometry they probably would
recouped their costs, and possibly made a few dollars as well.
Thanks John, keep it going!
Gary
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Lego Track!
|
| (...) No, it can't, but this topic isn't new. Check out the ILTCO library for a presentation by Ben Fleskes about (URL) track geometry>. He served up everything TLG would need to proceed with this idea years ago. I believe that TLG will never make (...) (20 years ago, 15-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
