| |
In lugnet.reviews, Richie Dulin writes:
> In lugnet.reviews, Kerry Raymond writes:
> > Thanks for the review, Richie.
> >
> > > Very good. While much more swooshable than the 'Camel (it's a bit more
> > > compact, and a whole lot sturdier)
> >
> > Here I would have to disagree. I don't find either of the Camel or the Baron
> > to be particularly sturdy and hence not particularly swooshable.
>
> Hmmm... I may have to collect more data on this. Certainly my prelimary
> data, based on medium speed swooshing at both full arm extension and half
> arm extension, combined with several strafing runs (complete with machine
> gun sound effects) against the now shipless Snottler crew, and some
> emergency landings on the living room floor indicated the 'Baron was
> infinitely more swooshable than the Camel.
>
> I'll report my findings (possibly with graphs and charts) in due course.
I conducted some experiments last night.... see
http://www.lugnet.com/loc/au/~1285/kites for details.
No charts yet, though :-)
Richie
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Plane Sailing? (was Re: 10024Red Baron)
|
| (...) I applaud your thoroughness, however, regarding the following passage: "...the tester decided not to continue out of fear for the strength of the Baron’s tailskid (his sole LEGO brown minifig shovel). It may well have survived four more (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 10024Red Baron
|
| (...) Hmmm... I may have to collect more data on this. Certainly my prelimary data, based on medium speed swooshing at both full arm extension and half arm extension, combined with several strafing runs (complete with machine gun sound effects) (...) (22 years ago, 28-Nov-02, to lugnet.reviews)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
