| |
"Kerry Raymond" <kerry@dstc.edu.au> wrote in message
news:H69tBF.DG9@lugnet.com...
> Thanks for the review, Richie.
>
> > Very good. While much more swooshable than the 'Camel (it's a bit more
> > compact, and a whole lot sturdier)
>
> Here I would have to disagree. I don't find either of the Camel or the • Baron to
> be particularly sturdy and hence not particularly swooshable.
Pah! You just haven't cottoned onto the ultimate swooshability mod -
motorise the propeller. A 5114 motor and 9V battery box fit easily into the
Camel, and probably the Baron too. It's probably a bit too much of a load on
a single 9V battery, but a fresh one turns the prop quite nicely.
Zzzzzzzzzzzeeeeeeeeeoooooowwww!!!!
--
Cheers,
Paul
LUGNET member 164
http://www.geocities.com/doctorshnub/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 10024Red Baron
|
| Thanks for the review, Richie. (...) Here I would have to disagree. I don't find either of the Camel or the Baron to be particularly sturdy and hence not particularly swooshable. The new struts on the Baron seem to come apart as much as the Camel's (...) (22 years ago, 28-Nov-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
