|
|
 | | Re: Lego not an original idea?
|
| (...) I'm not sure. What I do know (or have an opinion on) is that the LEGO compatibility of these plates is of marginal value. They only have studs on top, and it looks like really all you could do is build on top of them, which seems pretty (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Lego not an original idea?
|
| Santosh Bhat wrote in message ... (...) their (...) I do have one question relating to this. Our son is getting a Rokenbok set for Christmas which is a RC type building set. The ELEVATED road plates are Lego compatible (Mom has her eyes on these). (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Qantas Lego
|
| (...) This has come up before (the search func is down else I'd give a ref.) PeteC was the one IIRC who verified that, No it's not real Lego. James (who's surprised that he can remember stuff like that...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Qantas Lego
|
| (...) Quantas USED to have real Lego, I got some sets on my return flight from SYD to LAX... but I believe this is a non Lego, non compatible brand. I inadvertantly bought something like this a long time ago, the studs are smaller diameter and (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Qantas Lego
|
| (...) If it was Lego, I'm sure that would be mentioned. Check the minifigs, they are not yellow, the heads are larger than normal and the legs look a bit funny. The trans red and green elements on the end of each wing don't look like existing (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
