 | | Re: Looks like even less availability for us here.
|
|
Dave Low <stinglessbee@hotSPA...Email.com> wrote in message news:FzByLn.EK2@lugnet.com... (...) Australia (...) major (...) Studios (...) when (...) Didn't catch the original message, though I've got a few definitions of descriptions that I've (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Looks like even less availability for us here.
|
|
Yes, it is. Now cut it out with the <expletive deleted, although I don't really know why I bother anyway> and bring the thing down to something manageable, like <expletive deleted>, before I get myself annoyed as heck about something I normally (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | New catalogue (Was Re: Benjamin Whytcross's homepage ?)
|
|
Jamie Obrien wrote in message ... (...) (URL) And people were criticising the podracer bucket! There is no justice :-) Actually, there isn't any mention of the podracer bucket in this catalogue. Best value Lego set apart from the soccer sets and do (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Looks like even less availability for us here.
|
|
Dave Low wrote in message ... (...) material, (...) This "habit" certain people have is becoming <expletive indicating annoyance at the insertion of lengthy expressions which interrupt the flow of the sentence and make it very difficult to read, (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Looks like even less availability for us here.
|
|
(...) I think it means "totally new lines": it would really help Lego if they could get someone who is 100% fluent in English to write their promotional material, instead of a <expletive indicating a souped-up Babelfish using a Microsoft thesaurus (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
