 | | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not? —Leonard Hoffman
| | | | (...) I disagree - both about using "l3go" and about greater restrictions. Pushing towards an edge means that TLG will need to delinate it more clearly - which means less grey area. as for the "l3go", i think your average user would think something (...) (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Grey zone debate wanted! (was: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?) —Niels Bugge
| | | | | Well, I believe that that big grey zone is there because the people at TLC is just as uncertain on how to place the boundary as we are; not to terrorize us with having a secret boundary to sit behind anxiously waiting for the opportunity to punish (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Grey zone debate wanted! (was: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?) —Niels Bugge
| | | | | Judging by the reactions (or lack of) to my suggestion to move the page to a subdomain called l3go, I guess it'll be ok... Or is it? Last chance to complain before I commence the moveingprocess. Cheers NB (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | | |
