Subject:
|
Re: Advent Calendar: 4124 vs. 4524
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:37:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1171 times
|
| |
|
|
I had a thought today on my drive home:
While I agree that it is dissappointing that Lego made the two
calendars identical, I wonder just how many possible, reasonably
recognizable models can be built with fewer tan 12 pieces?
I suppose this would make it tough to come up with a truly new
calendar every year without duplication.
I think it would be interesting though, for someone to create a
brickshelf folder for "micro-models". Literally just start a
collection of models containing a dozen pieces or less. I just wonder
how many reasonable possibilities there are?....
Matthias Jetleb
P.S.: I'm not trying to excuse Lego's repackaging of an existing
product and calling it "new", just trying to call everyone's attention
to the fact that our expectations (which I shared until this evening)
of a new and different calendar every year might be difficult to
obtain.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Advent Calendar: 4124 vs. 4524
|
| (...) Then perhaps it's time to change the design of the calendar. What about one small model on the first day (sticking with today's type of designs) but then the pieces on the 2nd day are additional elements that are specific to day 1, making a (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
