 | | Non-Disclosure question
|
| I understand that certain fortunate individuals among us are privy to information that they've agreed not to divulge, and that's cool. However, once the info becomes public knowledge, will you folks be able to discuss what you had been told in the (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Non-Disclosure question
|
| (...) I am not a lawyer. And I would love to hear the definitive info but I think the answer is no. That is, disclosing what you knew or when you knew it or whether it was correctly predictive is itself a violation of a typical NDA. But I could be (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Non-Disclosure question
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GCs23G.9uJ@lugnet.com... (...) On the agreement I signed (and I talked this over with someone at LD, recently even), the agreement terminates one year from the date signed. This (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Non-Disclosure question
|
| (...) disclose. (...) I (...) two, (...) inside (...) It sounds like you asked, but the expiration on an NDA may not be the point at which you can reveal the information, but the point at which you need to sign a new NDA before sharing any further (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
