Subject:
|
Non-Disclosure question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 May 2001 18:40:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
293 times
|
| |
|
|
I understand that certain fortunate individuals among us are privy to
information that they've agreed not to divulge, and that's cool. However,
once the info becomes public knowledge, will you folks be able to discuss
what you had been told in the first place? That is, if the information is
(or isn't, for that matter) consistent with what you'd initially heard, are
you allowed to point this out?
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Non-Disclosure question
|
| (...) I am not a lawyer. And I would love to hear the definitive info but I think the answer is no. That is, disclosing what you knew or when you knew it or whether it was correctly predictive is itself a violation of a typical NDA. But I could be (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
