| |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Christian Gemünden writes:
> Usually, I am not the buy who steps in for a "mee too" (as this is mostly
> useless On Lugnet when talking about MOCs or new products. However, as this
> is a really important subject for the entire philosophy of Lugnet, I had to
> emphasize Mikes words, as they represent my opinion and I think each opinion
> is important in this case.
I have to put in a hearty 'mee too' with you, Christian.
> I personally dislike any decision that will result in limitation of
> communication between TLC and AFOLs. And although Todd does not see this
> change as "limitation", this recent incident has drawn my highest attention
> as Lugnet has lost a big part of his value for me!
Its lost value for me too. I prefer open communication, and not every post
of theirs at a lego.com address outside of lego.* groups can be considered a
marketing agenda. Give me a break.
> In case you disagree, put my posting aside as a regular "just his two
> worthless cents" *OR* give me more reasons that better explain the reasons
> that caused these hasty changes - I prefer the latter!
Unfortunately, given the number of posts against this, and the amount of
reconsidering being done, it looks like its the former.
With TLC's involvement in this group more, it won't be super-threatening
with marketing schtuff. LEGO Direct has said they want open communication,
and right now we're getting it, and I think that's a good thing. I'm sure
they want to do more in the future too, lets not hinder them.
I have a question, how does this fit with the lego.direct posting
restriction rules being considered? If both were implemented, it would make
open communication *very* difficult.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: ME TOO
|
| I've been skimming the posts about this issue, and maybe I'm missing the point, but it seems to me that if LEGO didn't want its people posting on lugnet, they woud take care of that at lego. Often you hear about people workgin at such-and-such and (...) (23 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | ME TOO
|
| (...) Usually, I am not the buy who steps in for a "mee too" (as this is mostly useless On Lugnet when talking about MOCs or new products. However, as this is a really important subject for the entire philosophy of Lugnet, I had to emphasize Mikes (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
