 | | Re: Mac Java Clarification —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | Drastically snipped... (...) Is there anyone that finds this as ironic as I do? To run the great anti MS language on the great anti MS computer from within a browser, the browser that works best is the MS browser. FUT .geek ++Lar (23 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Mac Java Clarification —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | What exactly do you expect, when MS is a large stockholder in Apple? (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mac Java Clarification —Christopher Masi
|
| | | | | (...) Strange that no anti-trust people had a problem with that transaction. Back to Java, as I understand it, Internet Explorer does not have its own virtual machine, it uses MRJ, and Netscape has its own built in virtual machine. I thought that (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mac Java Clarification —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Never let reality get in the way of a good ironical statement... but ya. (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
