 | | Re: Lego New is Up (and ALREADY a mistake)
|
|
"Jude Beaudin" <shiningblade@home.com> wrote in message news:G0wqw7.LEM@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) changes. An hour ago I couldn't see the new siite but now I can. I like it a lot better, and the ability to buy on-line is obviously in (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up (and ALREADY a mistake)
|
|
"Jude Beaudin" <shiningblade@home.com> wrote in message news:G0wqw7.LEM@lugnet.com... (...) Do not have what? I see the site has been updated, I find it funny that you can't see it....esp. after you deleted all your temp files. Don't know what to (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up (and ALREADY a mistake)
|
|
(...) Does it mean I do not have it if I don't see any changes? i.e. is it that different from last week? Jude I deleted all temporary files with IE 5 and still I cannot see any changes. (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up (and ALREADY a mistake)
|
|
"Chris Gray" <cg@ami-cg.GraySage....ton.AB.CA> wrote in message news:m3zolabf70.fsf@...n.AB.CA... (...) I now have the new look too. Great improvement!! -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (URL) - Centralized LDraw Resources (URL) - Zacktron Alliance (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up (and ALREADY a mistake)
|
|
(...) Your browser cache might need flushing or something. I haven't visited www.lego.com for a while, but did so just now. I see 2 x 8's for sale with a picture of a 2 x 8, but no 2 x 6 picture or mention. The look is new for me, too. I don't have (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up (and ALREADY a mistake)
|
|
Well, the new Bulk pages already have a mistake - the 2x6 bricks use a picture of a 2x8 - wasn't that an OLD error that they never fixed? They had a perfect opportunity to fix it with the update, and blew it. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up
|
|
(...) Well, Looks like they are in the process of updating their DNS so it will have (mostly) propogated by tomorrow. Here's what the LEGO.COM dns servers are reporting for query lego.com: DNS101.TELIA.COM: No response (Doh!) DNS102.TELIA.COM: No (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up
|
|
"Bram Lambrecht" <BXL34@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:MABBIBJJFOJIOHD...wru.edu... (...) versions... (...) is (...) Are those small changes part of the new site though? It certainly looks the same to me - maybe I haven't looked deep enough. (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | RE: Lego New is Up
|
|
(...) It's up for me... Maybe the people who don't see it have cached versions... One thing I noticed is better names for the bulk parts (ex: Train window is only in parentheses, the main name is Wall Element). --Bram Bram Lambrecht (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up
|
|
(...) Maybe in your corner of the universe... not in mine. :) Looks like lego.com may be experiencing that weird slow progression again... James (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up
|
|
? not yet ? the same ! when ? ;-) play well Michel Roijen (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up
|
|
(...) Then what is new? Not the home page, bulk pages, catalog... Jude (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up
|
|
(...) Yah, I just checked it out -- it won't work for me. Evidently, the "Low-Band No Flash Site" still needs Javascript. :-( I haven't visited www.lego.com for almost a year now, due to their various user-hostile publishing policies... Cheers, - (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Lego New is Up
|
|
Hi folks, Thought I'd point out the the new Lego site is up. Jeff (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
"Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G0qIz0.MGG@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) to (...) pointless (...) No worries, Scott. That's how I saw [your post] at least, not to say that others didn't see it differently. And yes, there are many (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) TK, just need a clarification-- do we send all of our LEGO to *you*, or is the party line an admonition to the world to send *us* their LEGO? (...) Speaking of a good time, I was just thinking about how nice it will be in AZ pretty soon-- I (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) I (...) It the Australian nationl dish: (URL) A (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Scott Arthur writes: <snip> (...) Marmite!?! What does marmite mean? Jude (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) It is his job. (...) Now I am disappointed. I have no hate in me for anyone or anything, although I do have a particular dislike for marmite. :-) Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
For someone to go out of their way to inform Lugnet of announcements, etc.... it sure does seem like we could be a tad bit more grateful... not hateful... G (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
