 | | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
Besides being well-done and funny, we can recognise a highly ironical message behind this joke: If mainstream TLG were to produce a useful, very generic parts pack these days such as TECHNIC ball joints, it would probably market it as a hot-themed (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Contacting LEGO Australia.....
|
|
Hello all Could someone please let me know the best way to contact LEGO regarding..... ....A friend of mine is setting up a Playgroup with a specific focus on parents that have or have experienced depression or other mental illness's. It is a (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.people, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
"Kevin Salm" <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote in message news:H0ELLI.K33@lugnet.com... (...) call it (...) but (...) It was not me. I just happened to come accross it on Brickshelf and thought it was the oddest thing i'd seen in a while. I did not (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
XFUT: Off-topic.fun (...) plastic (...) left (...) pictures. But that does not prove or disprove that the item in question is or is NOT a genuine Lego product. My vote is that it is NOT a genuine Lego product. If it were, I would call it the lamest (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
Wow, time flies when you're having fun. Is it april again already? Duq "Troy's Surplus Lego" <legosales@tcphoto.net> wrote in message news:H0DwKA.Ltw@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
(...) Well, if it is a fake, it appears that someone went to the trouble to actually make one, as it shows up on the table in these other shots in the same gallery: (URL) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
(...) Really? I'd pay that much. But only if I needed the parts. (...) Actually, I think I've got enough, now. Steve (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) I vote for a pretty good fake. If you look at the reflections on the plastic surface of the blister pack and track them around, you can see one that traverses the price tag. How do they get the price tag under the plastic? And the (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
Even at $2.50 it still seems a little pricey to me. But, hey, who doesn't need more Yoda eyeballs? (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
(...) On that packaging I believe those logo choices, sizing and placements violate in-house design rules. a fake. but made me laugh. nice job. only, next time, remember that SYSTEM came off SW packaging years ago. :-) -Suz (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
(...) Wow! That's kinda odd, but rather dubious looking if you ask me. No set number, no part count (could be foreign I suppose?), wacky name for a set (heck, why make such a set?), and to date I can't think of any sets since the late 70's that have (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
(...) Wow! Meijer had those on clearance? I'm really surprised... Steve (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Interesting retail pack
|
|
Would anyone from LEgo care to comment on this: (URL) has to be the oddest thing i've seen recently... Troy (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: What set is this part from?
|
|
I agree, and I'm sure MANY others agree, that 730 was an absolutely awesome set for parts or building. I don't think it would be considered a Legend, however. I could definitely see it as a Classic or Variant, though. Jake - if you can, mention that (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the clones (Re: $Here’s the Deal$)
|
|
(...) For LDraw, we've 'declared' color code 383 to be for silver/chrome/metal. But chrome (and any metallic look) isn't a color so much as a surface appearance -- it's reflective, mirror-like. The only way to get a satisfying chrome (AFAIK) is to (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the clones (what the heck was all that?)
|
|
(...) Well I will always prefer violet over purple, (just in case I haven't made that completly clear yet :-D) as for chrome well... That would be cool but I would much rather have silver plastic parts. (as found in the Spiderman Green Goblin set) (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
Thats a nice truck JT. I especially like the personalized plate! -Rob "James J. Trobaugh" <james@ngltc.org> wrote in message news:H0BnwF.n0C@lugnet.com... (...) change (...) two (...) we (...) funny (...) supports (...) these (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
(...) Like I posted before in various threads I agree we are not the target market. Maybe if you have the finances to buy tons of sets just to get a few parts you need you can build whatever you like, most of us probably can't. And even then, some (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
(...) OK, OK... you guys convinced me. The stuff I perceive as european is no more authentic (to european prototypes) than the stuff you perceive as american is (authentic to american prototypes, that is). But parts is parts. We. are. not. the. (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
(...) Pocketses, my precious-sss...sss, Pocketses!! The secret to successful snarfing is lots of Pocketses. Gollum (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
(...) 4563 : loco doesn't look much German/Dutch to me... maybe French, but then the colors wouldn't be right. The red closed freight car is OK-ish, the rest is pretty much simplified 4564 : loco is pretty decent, bit like the MaK diesel range. (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
You both have something that I tried for two years in the model shop to get my hands on to no avail. *grin* Congrats! Best I could do was some of the hand molded new elements that they used to prototype new model designs. -john 3 (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
(...) Actually I have some of those, I found them inside of the sculptures that we rescued ((URL) They're kind of a funny brown gray color with lots of swirls. These were used as structural supports inside of the sculptures. While repairing the (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Santa Fe Cars - now on lego.com
|
|
(...) It's in the Train Catalog. I've seen it. 5 for $148 or 2 for $65. Paul SInasohn LUGNET #115 (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
(...) Well, I have a couple dozen assorted 'swirly' bricks.... They are kept very securely locked up. Paul Sinasohn LUGNET #115 (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the clones (what the heck was all that?)
|
|
I like it too. But I also liked the idea of purple and chrome... (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: $Here?s the Deal$
|
|
Could we please start trimming the newsgroups on this thread? Frank (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the clones (what the heck was all that?)
|
|
(...) at (...) Classroom (...) much (...) awesome (...) Wow that is so cool. Thanks for making the picture. (...) I am not quite sure what your mean here but I think that the new color scheme looks awesome. (...) -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
(...) Tell you what Larry, I'll colour you bright red, yellow and blue and see if that helps clear things up! :-) I guess these have all looked European in the past. The "DB" stickers didn't help matters. Being British though, they look as foreign (...) (22 years ago, 3-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Santa Fe Cars - now on lego.com
|
|
(...) I was hoping there would be a Christmas special of the Santa Fe loco + motor + two of the passenger Santa Fe cars + one Santa Fe baggage car. Where did you hear about the 5 car offer ? Regards, David (22 years ago, 3-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the clones (Re: $Here’s the Deal$)
|
|
(...) Thank you very much for the RGB list BTW: anychance you know what's the RGB for chrome? We live to build Yaron Dori (22 years ago, 3-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the clones (Re: $Here’s the Deal$)
|
|
(...) It was add as requested (URL) it still looks to me to much as the original for your judgement. Thank you all for the inputs. We live to build Yaron Dori (22 years ago, 3-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the clones (Re: $Here’s the Deal$)
|
|
(...) You got the purple color right on for "Prof Dumbledore." What I was getting at is that I hate that color. The violet color as found in the Hogwarts Classroom set it one of my favorite colors. As a result I think the ship would look much better (...) (22 years ago, 3-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:H08J4H.oG@lugnet.com... (...) That's exactly what I want to see, yes we *did* have them, but no more... Huw (22 years ago, 3-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
Honestly, I couldn't tell you. I was in the American model shop in Enfield and we had constraints that the model shop in Billund did not have. (Windsor Locks was just opening in my time and the Billund shop was handling their models.) We were not (...) (22 years ago, 3-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: $Here?s the Deal$
|
|
<SNIP> (...) Why of course! 1> 6987 MESSAGE-INTERCEPT BASE (URL) 6954 RENEGADE (URL) 6874 ALIENATOR (URL) because LEGO said so! 4> 6941 BATTRAX (URL) OF THESE !!!NEED!!! TO BE RE-RELEASED IN THESE COLORS LISTED HERE: -Minifigures could be wearing (...) (22 years ago, 3-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
(...) well, color me confused, don't we already have all that in 4563 and 4564? Just dust those off and reissue them (in different colors perhaps)! (...) But ya, everyone needs a Thomas. (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Now what?
|
|
(...) A great way for TLC to get their foot in the door WRT to European trains would be to get a licensing agreement with Britt Allcroft and produce some Thomas trains. Since they are all based upon prototypes anyway, I would think that we'd all (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: New CLASSIC SW Lego
|
|
(...) The Sith Infiltrator was a good choice, because it was the personnal ship of a major character, Darth Maul (like Vader's TIE, for example). The Droid carrier is featured in a major scene of the movie, thus making it essential (like the Y-wing, (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions
|
|
(...) While setting up the DIY Spybotics SDK is great, it doesn't actually document the byte codes and communication capabilities, etc... of the Spybot brick. But using this DIY SDK I have successfully compiled MindScript code and downloaded it to (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
