|
|
 | | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| (...) Good point, though I've never personally favored Playmobil. Are they considered direct competition of LEGO, other than in a nebulous "if my money goes here, it can't go there" sort of way? They don't strike me as construction toys, though I (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| On Mon, 7 May 2001, Lawrence Wilkes (<GCz3rq.6q7@lugnet.com>) wrote at 16:15:36 (...) Selling service packs too cheaply in the wrong marketplace? :-) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| On Mon, 7 May 2001, Dave Schuler (<GCz263.2B8@lugnet.com>) wrote at 15:39:38 (...) You may have to think slightly out of the box for this one, but have you looked at Playmobil themes recently? They have excellent Castles, Pirates, Space and (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Trains, Garage Doors and more, oh my!
|
| "Jake McKee" <sink@countersinkdg.com> wrote in message news:GCtzzJ.Ewt@lugnet.com... (...) . And unfortunately, the garage doors are all gone. There actually (...) now. (...) So (...) So I can assume that when the garage doors were put back up on (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: A new area of LEGO.com: the Build section
|
| Tomas, Where did you get the time capsule model photos? Are they old stock or new photos taken for the web site. Any interactive picture would really add a lot. Rose "Tomas Clark" <tomas.clark@america.lego.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
