Subject:
|
Re: Does the existence of this group mean TLC now "endorses" LUGNET?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Apr 2000 08:12:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1364 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.lego, Scott Arthur writes:
> > Does the existence of this group mean TLC now "endorses" LUGNET? Does the
> > fact
> > the BJ posts on LUGNET mean that TLC "endorses" LUGNET {1}?
>
> I can't answer for Todd and/or Suz, but I greatly doubt it. Very very greatly
> doubt it. I would say flat-out no, but that's not for me to say.
Sorry, my post was not as clear as it could have been. The query was not really
directed at anyone really, I was just wondering that is all… I suppose only TLC
can say if the endorse what LUGNET is. After I posted I remembered that Brad
had said this in one of his posts:
"We intend also to provide support, either financial or otherwise, to as many
of the LEGO communities and clubs out there (both online and off) as we can.
I've even spoken to Todd Lehman regarding how we can provide support for LUGNET
(without, of course, in any way comprising its independence."
It sounds like perhaps they do approve.
Incidentally, while digging up Brad's old posts, I noticed that people have
taken the time to do the same… and then rate them:
http://www.lugnet.com/general/?n=11596
Scott A
> LUGNET is a fan-made site. The fact that TLC recognizes its existence does NOT
> mean it endorses it.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
